It suggests alternative questions toĬlassification of armed conflicts that may open up discussion of the boundaries Law’s fundamental claims - its claim to pragmatism and its claim to It argues that the concern with classification undermines two of In the context of theĭecisions in Hamdan v Rumsfeld, this think piece seeks to explore theĭistinctions drawn by international humanitarian law in relation to theseĪnd the way in which they impact on our teaching of the Most internationalīegin by analysing these distinctions and thereby drawing the boundaries within Prefaced with an analysis of the distinctions that are drawnĬonflicts and other acts of violence, and between international and [Any discussion of the law that applies in armed conflict is usually IVĜHARACTERISATION AND THE TEACHING OF INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAWĬONFLICTS FOR THE PURPOSES OF TEACHING INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW.B International versus Internal/Non-International Armed Conflicts.AĚrmed Conflicts versus Other Violence.II HIGHLIGHTING THE PROBLEM WITH CLASSIFICATION: HAMDAN V RUMSFELD.Melbourne Journal of International Law >ĭRAWING LINES IN THE SAND - CHARACTERISINGĬONFLICTS FOR THE PURPOSES OF TEACHING INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW Alison | Feedback Melbourne Journal of International Law Duxbury, Alison - "Drawing Lines in the Sand - Characterising Conflicts for the Purposes of Teaching International Humanitarian Law" MelbJlIntLaw 14 (2007) 8(2) Melbourne Journal of International Law 259
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |